I loved boys’ books when I was a kid. Boys’ books involved excitement, adventure, people working things out. Girls’ books never seemed to get any more exciting than girls sneaking comics into school, or Flora MacDonald rowing her Bonnie Prince Charlie boat – since he was declared “bonnie” I really wasn’t that interested. So I read my brothers’ Christmas gifts before I read my own. And I considered myself in reading heaven when my parents bought me a complete set of Conan Doyle stories. Yay!
Today’s books are different. There are lots of female protagonists rising above terrible dangers. I’m almost embarrassed to recommend books to my husband because I wonder if he feels as I once did, that all the best books are for girls. But we’ve learned together, it really doesn’t matter if the protagonist is male or female – I loved my brothers’ boys’ adventure tales, and what mattered was the story, the characters, events, ideas and places in some kind of balance. Same now; my husband loves Ninth House.
Before we married, my husband introduced me to his favorite science fiction books. The balance was different. The ideas and places mattered more than story and character. And I was intrigued. So many cool ideas.
Modern books – at least the ones we’ve been enjoying – give greater prominence to characters. But, rather like the ideas of those old scifi novels, they have to be convincing characters. They don’t have to be male or female, or bi, or trans, or… But they have to be believable.
I got hooked on Ursula LeGuin at some point. Her books have fantastic balance. The characters are part of the idea and part of the place, and everything comes together in a convincing whole. I wish I could write like her! But, meanwhile, I’ll work on creating convincing characters for my novels, stories, novellas… and even for poems?
So what makes a good character?
Influenced by Le Guin, I’d suggest a character has to be a natural part of the story’s time and place; they have to belong to the idea that’s driving the story. Because ideas are “outside” the “normal”, I guess that means the character has to not quite belong, even though they’re naturally part of the setting. A child protagonist will have to be inquisitive, maybe even disruptive. An adult will have to be, at least in part, an outsider. An alien will learn. An octopus will ponder (I loved Remarkably Bright Creatures!)…
Where does that leave the observer narrator – not part of the story at all; just watching it play out? I guess I’d want my observer to enjoy the same sort of curiosity as the reader, or else to be so different that the reader wants to understand the observer as well as the story.
Which leaves me still pondering… what makes a good character? Maybe it’s just someone who lives in the author’s head and talks so much the author has to let them out. I need to get back to letting my characters out!